Home
About Me
About My Book
Announcements
Book Excerpts
What Others Say
Send Me Email
The Articles:
Urban Sprawl
New Urbanism
Old Urbanism
Standard Of Living
Architexture
Europe
Talks And Speeches
Food And Wine
Other Articles
Recent Material
Regular Columns

Trading Places -
The City and the Suburb
[Excerpt From Chapter Four]
"The sloughed-off environment becomes a
work of art in the new invisible environment."
-- Marshall McLuhan in a conversation with William Irwin Thompson; quoted
in Thompson, Coming into Being
"The bloodthirsty national merchants and
the Chamber of Commerce have pretty well gutted the place I remember and taken
and hucked the town's original character into the overall commercial park.
The center of town, which when I was a kid hadn't changed much in the century,
and was pleasingly timeworn and functional, has now either been torn down
or renovated for artificial preservation as an example of itself."
-- description of Lexington, Kentucky, from Richard Hell's autobiographical novel,
Go Now2
The King William neighborhood in San Antonio is an elegant place of huge
turreted Victorians sitting on expansive lots. German immigrants built the
homes in the mid--and late nineteenth century, after they had grown rich industrializing
the city. In San Antonio then, you were as likely to hear German on the streets
as English or Spanish. An old photograph from the 1880s shows a sign on a
bridge warning people to walk their horses. The notice is given in three languages--English,
German, and Spanish.
Like many beautiful old neighborhoods, King William now mixes entrenched urban
homesteaders with tourism. In one count there were more than seventy bed and
breakfasts in the neighborhood, and tour buses cruising the streets have been
regulated. It's ironic, because in the 1960s, the neighborhood was nearing
abandonment, with the huge old homes falling into disrepair. But a wealthy
believer bought and renovated a handful of homes, and suddenly a reverse exodus
was on.
The tourism load is heavy in part because the neighborhood sits just a stone's
throw from downtown and the city's famous River Walk, the winding subterranean
path along water's edge now lined with restaurants, stores, and souvenir stands.
Aboveground are the city's largely turn-of-the-century streets and buildings,
which also include the ancient Alamo Mission and the modern shopping mall
built a few years back. The mall gives armies of conventioneers another place
to spend money.
I stayed in King William in 1997, in one of the ubiquitous bed and breakfasts.
I was there on a magazine assignment, and I began my morning around the dining
table with two couples who were there on vacation. They were from New Orleans,
but the husbands knew San Antonio well because they traveled there frequently
on business.
Knew the suburbs, that is. Like most businesspeople in the area, they conducted
the bulk of their business out in the peripheries of the metropolitan area,
in an environment of sprawling highways, office parks, and shopping centers
that was casually called, no kidding, "Loopland." The name came from the beltway
that encircled the metropolitan area and spawned the subsequent sprawl. It
was a maddening, unholy place. Glass buildings were shoved right up to the
high-speed freeway, and the system of exit ramps seemed like something out
of a Mad Max movie. But this was now the true Main Street of San Antonio,
the place where the wealth of the metropolitan area was produced, and where
the bulk of new businesses and industries were formed.
In fact, so strong was Loopland's pull that the two businessmen, despite having
traveled to the city for years, had never been downtown before or to any of
the adjacent picturesque neighborhoods. The entire downtown, which includes
the Alamo, the River Walk, and the business district, was a mystery to them.
It was only now, on vacation, accompanied by their wives and children, that
they were taking the chance to see "the city."
The couples' relationship with downtown is a good example of how contemporary
center cities and suburbs have traded places. Older center cities--when successful--tend
to be small, precious places with a limited function and market. The downtown
of San Antonio was a make-believe world suitable for wives and children, who
could pretend or believe they were seeing the real San Antonio.
The real San Antonio, of course, was out in Loopland. That's where the wealth
of the region was being produced, that is where new businesses were being
formed.
The parts of San Antonio's downtown that had been unable to convert themselves
into tourist centers were dying. That included lovely but abandoned nineteenth-century
office buildings and grand old theaters. Why? Because the business and essential
living of the city were no longer being conducted in the center, and so the
streets and buildings were no longer able to make a go at it by being utilitarian
tools. They could only make it, to paraphrase Richard Hell, as artificially
preserved examples of themselves.
The suburbs and city have reversed historic roles. The city now represents
order, stability, community, and the human scale. The suburbs have become
the example of constant change, gigantism, uncontrolled technological forces,
and the rule of the marketplace. Whereas once the city symbolized a merciless,
soulless world, and the suburbs calmness, family, and nature, the two worlds
have almost completely traded places in what they represent.
Marshall McLuhan's statement "The sloughed-off environment becomes a work
of art in the new invisible environment" is an accurate description of why
this has occurred. The urban grid of streets grouped around a port or a train
station or a streetcar line has ceased to be the central marketplace of society.
It has been replaced by a tangle of streets built around freeway exits. And
so the older form has gone from something utilitarian, a tool, to something
whose aesthetics and value can be seen more clearly and admired because we
are now outside it. The urban street is, to quote Joel Garreau, author of
Edge City, an antique. And like an antique, it is seen as valuable merely
for being, not for what it does. In San Antonio, the downtown plays an important
role in the economy by nurturing tourism and the convention trade. But this
is a passive, more gentle function than serving as the central arena of industry
or the marketplace.
An antique, whether it's an object or a process, can be studied, perfected,
and honed, similar to blues music, basket weaving, or the construction of
handmade paper. But the form is not alive in the same way as suburbia. We
can love cities because we are no longer in them. From society's collective
new home in the suburbs, we look back on them in wonder. I wonder when this
will happen to the suburbs? When will we admire a cloverleaf, an off-ramp,
and a gas station with an attached convenience store simply for their form
and style?
I am not scoffing at the task of reviving the city. Ultimately it is not just
the urban city but the metropolitan area that is, or can be, "a work of art,"
perhaps because we are now mentally outside of it in our global marketplace
and Internet-enveloped world. If we are to grapple effectively with the artistic
challenge before us, then we must understand city and suburb together and
how they interact as a whole.
What I seek to do in this chapter is to understand the dynamic between our
more traditional urban forms and the newer suburbs, and how this in turn relates
to the dynamic of the metropolitan area as a whole. To understand city and
suburb--and I use these words more in an iconic sense than a literal one,
for I believe the true cities today in a practical sense are entire metropolitan
areas--we need to understand how city and suburb have been viewed in history
and what goals they have represented. When twelfth-century Italian princes
built great urban piazzas, and when nineteenth-century park designers built
great suburban subdivisions, what were they striving for? What heaven were
they reaching for, and how far did it exceed their grasp?